chris.bracken.jp

Statically generated site for chris.bracken.jp
git clone https://git.bracken.jp/chris.bracken.jp.git
Log | Files | Refs

commit 223c1a9517982057d4395fc06d5a016655aef5e7
parent 9faf6e432279ed78e95140eba31f8651519315a1
Author: Chris Bracken <chris@bracken.jp>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 09:48:21 -0700

Publish site

Diffstat:
Mindex.xml | 4++--
Mpost/index.xml | 2+-
Mtags/meta/index.xml | 2+-
Mtags/software/index.xml | 2+-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/index.xml b/index.xml @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 14:55:23 -0700</pubDate> <guid>https://chris.bracken.jp/2020/05/thoughts-on-licences/</guid> - <description>I don&amp;rsquo;t pretend to think that the things I create have a whole ton of value, but I do think it&amp;rsquo;s important to carefully consider the terms under which they&amp;rsquo;re shared to ensure they&amp;rsquo;re consistent with my values. Despite my general dislike for all things legalistic, the most unambiguous way to state those terms is through a licence. So a couple days ago, I tossed LICENSE files into any of my public repos that didn&amp;rsquo;t already have one.</description> + <description>Software licences are probably the single most boring aspect of software development, but I it&amp;rsquo;s important to carefully consider the terms under which the stuff I hack on is shared to ensure they&amp;rsquo;re consistent with my values. Despite my general dislike for all things legalistic, the most unambiguous way to state those terms is through a licence. So a couple days ago, I tossed LICENSE files into any of my public repos that didn&amp;rsquo;t already have one.</description> </item> <item> @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ I&amp;rsquo;m a software developer who&amp;rsquo;s been fascinated by computers <guid>https://chris.bracken.jp/code/</guid> <description>You can find most of the public code I contribute to hosted at one of the following sites: - git.bracken.jp: My self-hosted git repos. GitHub: The most popular source code hosting solution and where most of my public contributions lie. GitLab: Better features and UI than GitHub. Significant contributions Flutter: portable, cross-platform app SDK and runtime. Most of my contributions focus on the portable C++ runtime, the platform-specific embedders, and tools.</description> +git.bracken.jp: My self-hosted git repos. GitHub: The most popular source code hosting solution and where most of my public contributions lie. GitLab: Better features and UI than GitHub. Significant contributions Flutter: portable, cross-platform app SDK and runtime. Most of my contributions focus on the portable C++ runtime, the platform-specific embedders, and tools. Dart SDK/VM: the Dart programming language is a strongly-typed, object-oriented, garbage-collected language with C-like syntax.</description> </item> </channel> diff --git a/post/index.xml b/post/index.xml @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 14:55:23 -0700</pubDate> <guid>https://chris.bracken.jp/2020/05/thoughts-on-licences/</guid> - <description>I don&amp;rsquo;t pretend to think that the things I create have a whole ton of value, but I do think it&amp;rsquo;s important to carefully consider the terms under which they&amp;rsquo;re shared to ensure they&amp;rsquo;re consistent with my values. Despite my general dislike for all things legalistic, the most unambiguous way to state those terms is through a licence. So a couple days ago, I tossed LICENSE files into any of my public repos that didn&amp;rsquo;t already have one.</description> + <description>Software licences are probably the single most boring aspect of software development, but I it&amp;rsquo;s important to carefully consider the terms under which the stuff I hack on is shared to ensure they&amp;rsquo;re consistent with my values. Despite my general dislike for all things legalistic, the most unambiguous way to state those terms is through a licence. So a couple days ago, I tossed LICENSE files into any of my public repos that didn&amp;rsquo;t already have one.</description> </item> <item> diff --git a/tags/meta/index.xml b/tags/meta/index.xml @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 14:55:23 -0700</pubDate> <guid>https://chris.bracken.jp/2020/05/thoughts-on-licences/</guid> - <description>I don&amp;rsquo;t pretend to think that the things I create have a whole ton of value, but I do think it&amp;rsquo;s important to carefully consider the terms under which they&amp;rsquo;re shared to ensure they&amp;rsquo;re consistent with my values. Despite my general dislike for all things legalistic, the most unambiguous way to state those terms is through a licence. So a couple days ago, I tossed LICENSE files into any of my public repos that didn&amp;rsquo;t already have one.</description> + <description>Software licences are probably the single most boring aspect of software development, but I it&amp;rsquo;s important to carefully consider the terms under which the stuff I hack on is shared to ensure they&amp;rsquo;re consistent with my values. Despite my general dislike for all things legalistic, the most unambiguous way to state those terms is through a licence. So a couple days ago, I tossed LICENSE files into any of my public repos that didn&amp;rsquo;t already have one.</description> </item> <item> diff --git a/tags/software/index.xml b/tags/software/index.xml @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 14:55:23 -0700</pubDate> <guid>https://chris.bracken.jp/2020/05/thoughts-on-licences/</guid> - <description>I don&amp;rsquo;t pretend to think that the things I create have a whole ton of value, but I do think it&amp;rsquo;s important to carefully consider the terms under which they&amp;rsquo;re shared to ensure they&amp;rsquo;re consistent with my values. Despite my general dislike for all things legalistic, the most unambiguous way to state those terms is through a licence. So a couple days ago, I tossed LICENSE files into any of my public repos that didn&amp;rsquo;t already have one.</description> + <description>Software licences are probably the single most boring aspect of software development, but I it&amp;rsquo;s important to carefully consider the terms under which the stuff I hack on is shared to ensure they&amp;rsquo;re consistent with my values. Despite my general dislike for all things legalistic, the most unambiguous way to state those terms is through a licence. So a couple days ago, I tossed LICENSE files into any of my public repos that didn&amp;rsquo;t already have one.</description> </item> <item>